Home › Top 5 › Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka
Review: Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka — emptiness rebuilt as rigorous philosophy
★★★★☆4.4 / 5.0 (editorial rating)
Verdict: the study to read once you know the text. Westerhoff treats Madhyamaka not as mysticism but as a system of arguments and asks the hard questions head-on — above all, how Nāgārjuna can deny every position without collapsing into contradiction. The most demanding book on the shelf, and the most rewarding.
- Title
- Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction
- Author
- Jan Westerhoff (Professor of Buddhist Philosophy, University of Oxford)
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (2009)
- Length
- ~256 pp.
- Difficulty
- Advanced ★★★ — three to five weeks
Check price & availability on the Amazon product page
What it is — in three lines
A systematic philosophical study of Madhyamaka by Jan Westerhoff, now professor of Buddhist philosophy at Oxford, published by Oxford University Press in 2009. Despite the modest subtitle "A Philosophical Introduction," it is a rigorous, thematic reconstruction rather than a beginner's overview: it takes the concepts running through the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā — essence, the two truths, the tetralemma, emptiness itself — and asks whether, as philosophy, they hang together.
The core — can you deny every position?
Nāgārjuna makes an audacious move: he seems to reject every philosophical thesis, including, apparently, his own. He even says he has no thesis to defend. Is that coherent, or self-refuting? Westerhoff's book is organized around exactly this kind of question. He examines svabhāva (intrinsic essence) as the concept Nāgārjuna is really attacking, reconstructs the arguments against it, and works through the notorious puzzles: the "emptiness of emptiness" (if all things are empty, emptiness is too), the relation of conventional and ultimate truth, and whether Madhyamaka ends in scepticism, nihilism, or a defensible third thing.
If I had any thesis, that fault would apply to me; but I have no thesis, so there is no fault of mine.
— Nāgārjuna, Vigrahavyāvartanī 29 (a passage central to Westerhoff's discussion; editorial gloss)
The pleasure of the book is watching a first-rate analytic philosopher refuse to let Nāgārjuna off the hook — and find that the arguments are stronger and stranger than the slogans suggest.
Three highlights
1. Organized by problem, not by chapter
Instead of marching through the verses, Westerhoff builds the discussion around concepts — essence, truth, negation, causation — which is what lets him treat Madhyamaka as a system rather than a sequence.
2. The hard puzzles met directly
The emptiness of emptiness, the status of the tetralemma, the charge of self-refutation: the questions most books tiptoe around are the ones this book is about.
3. Philosophically serious, historically careful
Westerhoff reads the Sanskrit and respects the tradition, but judges the arguments as arguments. It is scholarship and philosophy at once.
What to watch out for
Two honest notes. First, the subtitle undersells the difficulty. This is not the book to meet Nāgārjuna in — open it before you have read the text and the reconstructions will float free of anything concrete. Come here after Garfield and Siderits and Katsura, with the verses already in mind. Second, it is one strong interpretation among several; Westerhoff argues for particular readings that other specialists dispute. Read it as the sharpest available case, not as the settled verdict — which is exactly the right way to end a serious course of reading.
Check price & availability on the Amazon product page