This page contains promotional (PR) links. Book links go to Amazon (amazon.com).

The Philosophy Bookshelf

Answering the one question: where do I start?

HomeTop 5 › The Consolations of Philosophy

The Consolations of Philosophy review — philosophy as tools for living

2026-07-09|The Philosophy Bookshelf Editorial Room

★★★★☆4.2 / 5.0 (our rating)

Verdict: The book to start with if you want philosophy to be useful from day one. De Botton takes six philosophers and sets each against a specific everyday misery — unpopularity, poverty, frustration, inadequacy, heartbreak, difficulty — and shows the idea doing real work. It is philosophy as a medicine cabinet rather than a museum, and it's a genuine pleasure to read.

The Consolations of Philosophy (jacket-style image of our own design)
Title
The Consolations of Philosophy
Author
Alain de Botton
Publisher
Vintage
Format
6 essays
Difficulty
Entry ★☆☆ — about 5 hours

Kindle edition available/prices and availability on Amazon

What it is — in three lines

Alain de Botton pairs six philosophers with six ordinary predicaments and shows how each thinker's ideas can actually help. First published in 2000 and adapted into a TV series, it's the book that launched de Botton's career as philosophy's most readable populariser. Short, elegant, and quietly serious under the charm.

The six consolations

Socrates — consolation for unpopularity. Epicurus — for not having enough money. Seneca — for frustration. Montaigne — for inadequacy. Schopenhauer — for a broken heart. Nietzsche — for difficulties.

——the book's six-part structure

The device is simple and it works: by anchoring each thinker to a felt problem, de Botton gives you a reason to care before the argument arrives. You meet Epicurus not as a name but as an answer to "why doesn't more money make me happier?", and Seneca as a coach for the moment the train is cancelled. It's the same "philosophy as a weapon for daily life" impulse that fuels the practical shelf everywhere — done with unusual grace.

Three things to look for

1. The Schopenhauer and Nietzsche chapters

The last two are the strongest — heartbreak read through Schopenhauer's pessimism, and difficulty through Nietzsche's "what does not kill me." If those click, our Schopenhauer and Nietzsche shops are the next step.

2. It's a gateway, not a summary

Each chapter is an invitation: read the essay, then go to the philosopher. Used that way, this is one of the most efficient on-ramps in the genre.

3. Prose you'll actually enjoy

De Botton writes like an essayist, not a lecturer. For a reader burned by dry textbooks, that alone can be the difference between finishing and quitting.

One caveat

This is a set of readings, not a system. De Botton selects what serves his theme, so a specialist would call the portraits partial — Nietzsche in particular is softened. Take it as a beautifully written invitation, not the last word on any of the six. For the rigorous treatment, that's what Think is for.

Editorial note Reading time about 5 hours. We rate this as an on-ramp — how well it turns a curious reader into someone who seeks out the philosophers themselves — kept separate from scholarly completeness. Summaries are our own; no publisher copy is reproduced.

Prices and availability are on the Amazon product page.