Home › Top 5 › Eichmann in Jerusalem
Review: Eichmann in Jerusalem — the banality of evil, and the best Arendt to read first
★★★★★4.8 / 5.0 (editorial rating)
Verdict: the most approachable book Arendt wrote, and the one to read first in her own words. Sitting in on the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann, she found not a monster but a thoughtless, careerist official — and coined the phrase that made the book famous and infamous: the banality of evil. Concrete, gripping, and the true door into her thought.
- Title
- Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
- Author / Intro
- Hannah Arendt; introduction by Amos Elon
- Publisher
- Penguin Classics
- Length
- ~336 pp.
- Difficulty
- Intermediate ★★☆ — about ten hours
Check price & availability on the Amazon product page
What it is — in three lines
Sent by The New Yorker to cover the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann — the SS officer who managed the logistics of the deportations — Arendt turned her reports into this book (1963). This Penguin Classics edition, with an introduction by Amos Elon, is the revised text, with the material that emerged after the trial and Arendt's postscript answering the controversy. It is journalism, philosophy, and moral reckoning at once, and by far her most readable book.
The core — the banality of evil
What shocked Arendt in the dock was ordinariness. Eichmann was not a raving Jew-hater out of propaganda but a diligent bureaucrat who spoke in clichés, was proud of doing his duty, and seemed unable to think from anyone else's point of view. From this she drew her most famous and most misread idea: that the greatest evils of the century were carried out not only by fanatics but by unremarkable people who had stopped thinking — the banality of evil.
The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal.
— Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem
The phrase is not an excuse for evil. It is a warning: that thoughtlessness — the refusal to judge, the surrender to routine and orders — can make an ordinary person a component in an enormous crime.
Three highlights
1. Ideas through a real event
Because the argument grows out of a trial you can follow — the testimony, the logistics, the man — the book is far more approachable than Arendt's treatises. You meet her thinking already in motion, applied to something concrete.
2. The famous phrase, in context
"The banality of evil" appears almost in passing, at the very end. Reading it inside the whole report, rather than as a slogan, is the only way to understand what Arendt did and did not mean by it.
3. The postscript
Arendt's reply to her critics, included here, is a masterclass in what she was actually claiming — invaluable given how fiercely, and how often unfairly, the book was attacked.
What to watch out for
Two honest notes. First, this is one of the most contested books of the last century: Arendt's remarks on the Jewish Councils and her tone drew furious criticism, some of it fair. Read it as a provocation to think, not as the last word — and let Responsibility and Judgment show you how she later deepened the argument. Second, it assumes some feel for who Arendt was; if you have not yet, an hour with Hill's short life first will pay off. This is a report from inside a storm, and it reads best when you know the weather.
Check price & availability on the Amazon product page